The soap opera that is Charlton Athletic threw up another episode this week to rival all the joy of an Eastenders’ Christmas Special, with the decision taken to cut short the season of our most talented youngster, Jonjo Shelvey, in favour of an immediate cash injection.
Not for the first time in recent years, the decision leaves supporters asking more questions than it provides answers, particular on whether it was a decision enforced from the boardroom, or created by the indifference of the manager.
If the decision was an enforced financial one, then it really does provide an ill-timed stark reminder of the gravity of the desperate financial predicament that our club is currently submerged in. It suggests that the sizeable financial restructuring the club underwent earlier in the season was purely designed to get us through to the end of the season and no further, and given that Shelvey was secured to a professional contract at the same time, it looks more than likely that his sale this summer was part of the restructuring, and nothing more than a formality.
The extent of our financial mire is one that some supporters fail to fully grasp. Charlton has been a severe loss-making organisation for five successive seasons, recording losses of £37.5m since 2006 before you even factor in what this season’s further hefty deficit is likely to be. At no stage over the past four years has the loss been below £20k a day, and in some years in excess of £30k a day. What was created by ill-management and dire planning on the eventuality of relegation from the Premiership and the failure of immediate return is now proving impossible to arrest. From the outside, hopes of a white knight rescuing the club from its debts and providing some form of positive plan for the years ahead appear more and more unlikely to longer the club scrambles to purely avoid falling into administration.
So if the desire to sell Shelvey was a desperate financial need, then we should all be concerned, particularly following so soon after the recent other injection of forward season ticket sales. With no further individual on the books with the ability to attract a seven-figure sale, you have to question just how much longer the attempts to avoid administration can be maintained, and equally how much good is it really doing the club as a whole in the long-term.
If however, the decision to sell Shelvey now was one led by the managers’ endorsement, then this opens up a whole host of other questions. Mainly, why the hell when the need for promotion is so imperative would a manager choose to limit his resources ahead of the unpredictability of the play-offs ?
Phil Parkinson stated yesterday that Shelvey had ‘lost his way a little’ this season, and though some supporters will disagree, this argument does carry some weight. In our supporters-polled post-match ratings, Shelvey has ranked in the following positions for his twenty meaningful appearances this season in comparison to his team-mates:
MOM – once
2nd – once
3rd – once
4th – three times
5th –
6th – twice
7th –
8th – once
9th – three times
10th – six times
11th – once
12th –
13th - once
The truth is he has not been setting the world alight this season, been a key member of our starting side, or pushed on in the way that all of the supporters hoped he would have. But has that all been down to a young player ‘losing his way’ a little, and if so, why ?
Shelvey first broke into the Charlton first team as a mere 16-year old twenty-four months ago. In his debut at Barnsley in the tail-end of the 2007-08 season, he impressed all with his display, whilst in the following game at home to Coventry, he had everyone purring of what was to come for the future, as a sample from the comments on our Forum proved:
“The boy looks like a proper star in the making, I thought he had a cracking game – Off It”,
“Jonjo was brilliant today, and he is a big guy, knocking Hughes off the ball for fun most of the game. He also has a great range of passing, and isn’t scared to shoot- Sir Percy” and
“Really was an incredible performance for a 16 year old. Wasn't only the passing, composure, running on the ball, vision and strength that impressed me, but that tackle in the second half which he had no right to get to! Really is promising for the future that we have players such as Shelvey – Tricky”
In those two games, Shelvey played as a traditional centre midfielder in a 4-4-2 formation, recording man of the match displays as a 16-year old at Championship level. While there is no doubting that Shelvey appears less impressive twenty-four months on, the obvious question is why over the forty-nine games that Charlton have played this season at a lower level, has the player not once appeared in the position that which he so clearly impressed and showed so much promise ?
The sparse use of Shelvey this season has been focused in playing as a split-striker, with occasional dalliances onto the wing. Neither are his natural position, and while his positional awareness has improved greatly as the season progressed in the split striker role, it failed to accentuate the strengths that the player possesses and accentuated the weaknesses in his game, particularly through playing isolated, largely playing with his back to goal and dealing with an aerial ball. If Shelvey has lost his way this season, how much of that has been down to the individual attempting to adapt to an unfamiliar role in his desire to simply play first-team football, and how much of it has been down to management failing to play a player at his strengths ?
With this in mind, a parting appears something that suits all three parties; board, manager and player. Why the decision now and not in a month’s time though defies most logic. My best guess is that the manager was approached with regard to the bid and said that the player was not going to be a key element for the forthcoming games. With that in mind, the decision was taken to secure the deal now rather than risk it on a triviality effecting what the manager believes to be a non-key player.
The move does provide a sour backdrop at a crucial point in the season. Firstly, it highlights to our supporters and players the pitiful financial position of the club; secondly it gives our rivals the illusion that we have weakened our squad at a crucial time. Thirdly, it provides closure on a real sense of frustration to supporters that we have seen anywhere near the best of a homegrown player who showed so much initial promise. The first two can be quickly eradicated with a purposeful performance and victory tomorrow against promotion rival Leeds United. The third though is a feeling that shall always remain.
Shelvey leaves though with the best wishes of all Charlton supporters. He is a talented individual with what appears a good attitude and who just wants to play football, and a player that this site has been proud to sponsor for his two professional seasons.
Whether this is the right move for him remains to be seen. Liverpool is a club set to go through a real transitional period, which may be of benefit to him, but equally carries many risks. He has not been signed by the manager, who is unlikely to have ever seen him play, but by a managerial umbrella with a remit to try and deliver some young English players. Whilst some elements of his game will be better suited around more technical players, there are still plenty of aspects of his game that require a fair bit of work before he will gracing the Premiership stage on a regular basis, particularly his short-distance speed and reaction.
We wish him the best of luck, and will always keep one-eye on his career hoping he succeeds.
Comments
For me this is the best point:
the obvious question is why over the forty-nine games that Charlton have played this season at a lower level, has the player not once appeared in the position that which he so clearly impressed and showed so much promise ?
The sparse use of Shelvey this season has been focused in playing as a split-striker, with occasional dalliances onto the wing. Neither are his natural position, and while his positional awareness has improved greatly as the season progressed in the split striker role, it failed to accentuate the strengths that the player possesses and accentuated the weaknesses in his game, particularly through playing isolated, largely playing with his back to goal and dealing with an aerial ball. If Shelvey has lost his way this season, how much of that has been down to the individual attempting to adapt to an unfamiliar role in his desire to simply play first-team football, and how much of it has been down to management failing to play a player at his strengths ?
I don't think he is the only Charlton player to suffer from the long ball this season either. I wouldn't compare them for a minute, but Akpo has looked more comfortable with the ball cut across the face of goal from the wings rather than with his back to goal in the middle of the pitch where he clearly does not have the intelligence/ability to deal with it. Iwelumo was also constantly used as a target man rather than having the ball played to his feet.
We should have persisted with him in the middle of a flat midfield four a bit more in my opinion.
More importantly, where's Jonjo taking his mum on holiday? - http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/2953961/Jonjos-shelved-for-promo-push.html
"When the board came last week and told me it was going to happen we thought of a few scenarios of keeping it quiet but not playing Jonjo and only announcing it after the play-offs were out of the way."
With a board prepared to think like this, don't be surprised to get a leaflet handed to you one day, telling us the club is going to ground-share.
His season hasn't panned out how anyone probably thought it would, especially after being a first choice at the start of it.
Really do hope it works out for him, and the fact that Liverpool look likely to have a new manager (and possibly backroom team) won't work against him in the next few seasons.
We really are in the mire financially.
only way out is promotion...
come on boys, come on pull out all the stops...
just got a wave of nervousness and my heart started beating faster typing that...
what this club does to you....
And if did will we *then* go into administration to take the 12 point deduction rather than in Division One?
For years we were told we were the model club off the pitch.....
And people laugh at Jordan.....
So what if we are promoted!.... This squad will need significant rebuilding and the players will expect a better wage deal surely......
I did post several weeks ago that if we do get promoted then our troubles could really start, as I cannot see this board investing more!
Not really something that we really want to hear I guess, but our position does seem dire!
If we stay in this league administration is looking more than a possibility, otherwise it is death by a thousand cuts........not that we want that as well!
Can there?
promotion can help for sure, but the only way forward is a takeover by a Mr big...
As for the reason for him leaving, it seems to me that it was Jonjo's frustration at not getting a game that has made the move happen now, rather than anything else.
As for Shelvey I'm deeply diaspointed we didnt get more out of himm this year - no idea whose fault that is
He's out of contract in a few weeks and a free agent.
First point, I think a lot of young players can look better, or more all round, on their debut. Grant Basey is another example, without looking, I think most people were probably happy with his debut, apart from the odd comment about a lack of pace or occasional mistake. They play against players and up against managers that know little if anything about them, there's less pressure and expectation from the crowd and have the excitement of making their debut/first few games in the team. Certainly can't judge a young players consistency on 4/5 games, or even half a season. Weaknesses often aren't as clear in a players first few games, probably partly down the expectations of players making their debuts, and as I said, the opposition know a lot less about them. He also played alongside Holland in those first two games, who probably helped him with positioning and the little things. I can't imagine most of the midfielders now, if any, helping out as well or as often.
Secondly compare who Shelvey was playing in the second half of last season, probably his most consistent and longest run of form in the first team. Behind him he usually had Racon and Zheng, two players that keep their passing short and tidy to feet, exactly what suits Shelvey. They're also comfortable with the ball at their feet, both like to run with the ball, which created space for Shelvey, Burton and others. This season he's had a pure defensive midfielder in Semedo, who although has the tidy passing, he doesn't run with the ball, and he doesn't make runs from midfield, it's not his job or his instinct to do it. Alongside Semedo it's been Racon, who himself hasn't played as well, but that's for another thread. When Bailey is in there, he's not as comfortable on the ball as Zheng and Racon, runs with it less, and his passing is less accurate with far more attempts at the 'hollywood pass'.
About his best position, I think Shelvey can be comfortable behind a striker. Though to that the team have to play a passing game, and for that you probably need more technical players than Bailey and Semedo. That's not a moan at them, just that Zheng and Racon can pass, move and control the ball better, which suits Shelvey. Even with Racon and Semedo behind Shelvey, Racon also looked better having an attacking player in Zheng (some might say Racon was more motivated last season though).
I think he is a central midfielder, but he's only at his best there with a lot of freedom, he needs to be able to find space wherever that is on the pitch. It's a free role really. Parky, whether right or wrong, probably doesn't feel we can allow him that in a four man midfield. It's a risk as you surely can't be as organised and therefore defend as well if one midfielder needs that freedom to play his best. Some games I think we'd have been comfortable, as I've mentioned before, Stockport at home in particular. In time Shelvey won't need so much freedom as he reads the game better, but is he months or years away from doing that consistently? Parky took the safe option of not risking that in a promotion challenge, problem is it means although we concede less, we offer less going forward. So as I said, there were times to use him more, but Parky was right not to put Shelvey in central midfield in games like Colchester at home.
At times you can see or at least sense he's frustrated, can't blame him for that, you can't play the same pass and move football he wants to attempt with many of the players we have. If he came through around 03/04, I think he'd have had some great moments with Di Canio, Jensen and Parker, and he'd have looked just as promising in the Premier League. As he's came through while we were a Championship and later League One side, there are people that doubt he can step up to that level.
I agree about his weaknesses, his lack of acceleration and reactions. In time his reactions should improve with experience, and I hope in the next couple of years he can improve on his strength and acceleration. If he does I think that strength should help his confidence in the air, another weakness of his. If he can do all that, there could see an improvement in him like we saw with Parker at 20/21 (though still a completely different type of midfielder). I'm not certain he will, but I think he's got the drive and ambition to give it a real go, and now a much better quality of player around him which will surely benefit him.
Sorry if this a bit too long!
But where Lampard compensates is with technique and footballing intelligence: a superb 1st touch, and an abilty to read the game well with great anticipation and movement off the ball.
So lack of acceleration needn't be a problem for Jonjo, even at the highest level.
all this about no income over the summer, how about season ticket renewals just come in and to come over that period?
also how can Liverpool buy him apparently before season is over, or is it technically outside the window that the registration will change?
I think Shelvey and Bailey ZZ and others have suffered from the Pardewkinson approach of trying to play all our best players at once regardless of their best position, which in my view has failed to get the best out of them
But you can't register him to be eligible to play outside of the transfer windows/deadline.
In fact he might end up a more similar player to Lampard than Gerrard.
Good point razil, I think that's a problem many managers have had. England a good example at much higher level
than Charlton
Parker looked distinctly lightweight when he first came into the Charlton team and would disappear during matches but after careful nursing by Curbs for a bit got packed off to Norwich and came back a tougher, more confident complete player with the all action up and at them style we remember so well and still miss.
Lee Bowyer had the happy knack of popping up with goals when he broke into the side which compensated for the long periods of time during matches whereby he disappeared. We also had so few goals elsewhere in the side at the time his contribution was truly valued. For example,love them as we did, Carl leaburn and Garry Nelson were not especially prolific.
Jonjo has the potential to emulate both these players and in my book has started his career at least as well if not better than both Parker and Bowyer and neither of them have done badly. I don't recall Jonjo ever going missing during games which the other two both did at 17/18.
Can I have a badge now and get a card to join the clique?
And I'd like to know just what 'financial meltdown' would mean. Also, are we worse off then other clubs in this league? If so, why? Is it still players' wages? And running costs of The Valley?
I can't see why anyone would buy the club without it first entering administration. I would love to be wrong though. Troubled times ahead....
We have apparently sold 6,000 season tickets so if one assumes an average price of £250 (In arriving at this figure I've tried to factor in concessions as well as assuming, possibly wrongly, that most season ticket holders will be in the Covered End ie the cheaper part of the ground) we have an assured turnover of £1.5 million.
If we assume a desirable ratio of wages to turnover is (say) 70% we are looking at a wages bill of £1.05 million. If an average wage for a league 1 player is (say) 3k a week then we can afford precisely 6.73 players!
We obviously have rather more players than that plus non-football staff at least two of whom are allegedly also on around £3k a week.
In the depths of league 1 I'm not aware of too many more income streams other than bums on seats. I've not factored in non-season ticket income because we simply don't know how many will attend each week. However let's assume £500k extra turnover, being a mixture of tv income and projected matchday sales, which takes total turnover up to £2 millon. That extra £500k (at our 70% wage ratio) allows us another 2.24 players!
These simplistic calculations illustrate graphically to me why the Club is losing money hand over fist and AFKA's figures are probably realistic rather than pessimistic.
The depressing thing is that there are a limited number of good players who can be sold to paper over the cracks and logically selling good players leads to poorer performances leads to fewer bums on seats....
The fact that last year we had far too big a squad, probably out of players refusing to budge, and that again this year having a squad of 30 plus as well as a high executive club ratio of management has not helped!
Peter Varney stated that the income from tv was £350,000 at this level if my memory is correct!, and as you state there seems little chance of additional revenue without draconian measures!
In the absence of fresh investment, or a takeover, both of which I think is highly dubious!, I think the passing around of the hat to the directors may not be as positive this time round!
In the shorterm, could not the season ticket offer that ended be re-introduced to get some cash in for working capital!, what about a family special deal, 2 adults get you a free under 16, or some such offer!
I am sure that the marketing department have poured over these sort's of issues, one thing is for sure It aint easy! But to coin a phrase that the Chairman penned yesterday.......
'we have to get real' ....... 'real' cash in to this club.
I have been saying all season that Shelvey has been played out of position. Even in the last five minutes at home to Norwich, when he came on and took up a deeper position, we had a reminder of his composure on the ball and his range of passing.
If he had played off Semedo this season in a five man midfield rather than off Burton I think we would have seen him dominate games and I don't think we would have been looking elsewhere for player of the season. It is so frustrating to me that our manager has ensured that we haven't seen the best of him - and now he has gone.
His game in the youth team was all about picking the ball up, setting attacks in motion and then arriving late in the box to convert any loose balls. From when Parkinson got hold of him all of that went out of the window.
A lion led by a donkey.
Not a perspective I would share,If discussing our best young player in years, being offloaded before we play some of the most important games in years, as well as trying to figure out what we as fans can do to help the club, and how we can go forward is a 'whine' then yes, I for one am a 'whino',better that than just lie back and say ' sweet FA' ......
anyway parky must be leaving or getting a new contract cos we don't let managers run down the last year of their contracts .....
That said, I am fed up of having managers at this club (Dowie, Pardew, Parkinson) who are simply incapable of getting the best out of their players. Jonjo could and should have taken this league by storm and with a decent manager in charge would have had far more involvement in matches and would have been our "Hoolahan" IMO.
What a sad state of affairs.